mindtangle

November 27th, 2008

“Big Bailouts” by % of GDP

Some friends sent me this blog post, which shows how the current planned bailout exceeds the combined expenditure of a number of government spending events from the history of our nation. That post uses the current cost of the bailout ($4.616 trillion), which some friends have noted is closer to $7.6 trillion if one includes unspent guarantees.

These numbers are inflation adjusted, but I was still curious to see how they stacked up in terms of national GDP at their time. I wanted to know how big each event was in proportion to what our nation was producing, since this number has grown dramatically over the last century.

The figures aren’t really apples-to-apples comparisons, since all of these expenditures were multi-year affairs. Having each of them broken into expenditures per year would yield some neat %-of-GDP graphs (different bumps for each item, % of GDP on the y-axis, years on the x-axis; volume representing the total cost of an expenditure.)

In any case, here are the non-matched-fruit comparisons. As you can see, the bailout is still truly massive, on par with (but lower than) the New Deal and WWII (which I added):

SpendingCostCost (Inflation-Adj.)%GDP (Year)
Marshall Plan$12.7 billion$115.3 billion5.20% (1947)
Louisiana Purchase$15 million$217 billionunavailable
Race to the Moon$36.4 billion$237 billion3.70% (1969)
S&L Crisis$153 billion$256 billion2.79% (1989)
Korean War$54 billion$454 billion14.23% (1953)
The New Deal$32 billion$500 billion56.74% (1933)
Invasion of Iraq$551 billion$597 billion5.03% (2003)
Vietnam War$111 billion$698 billion6.78% (1975)
NASA$416.7 billion$851.2 billion3.02% (2007)
WWII$288 billion$3,290 billion129.09% (1945)
2008 Credit Crisis Bailout$4,616 billion$4,616 billion32.65% (2008)

The spreadsheet is here.

Note: WWII cost figure from the National D-Day Museum

7 Comments »

Brain Circulation

This short biopic essay discusses a trend linking India and its diaspora that would be great to see to this extent in Vietnam. Snippet:

Our parents’ generation helped India from afar. They sent money, advised charities, guided hedge-fund dollars into the Bombay Stock Exchange. But most were too implicated in India to return. Our generation, unscathed by it, was freer to embrace it.

Countries like India once fretted about a “brain drain.” We are learning now that “brain circulation,” as some call it, may be more apt.

India did not export brains; it invested them. It sent millions away. In the freedom of new soil, they flowered. They seeded a new generation that, having blossomed, did what humans have always done: chase the frontier of the future.

No Comments »