Mudslinging
It looks like the Democratic primaries will be a war of attrition, from here on out. It seems clear to me that Obama will win; his lead at this point is nearly unsurmountable. But the race is still close enough from Clinton to stay in. Unfortunately, at this point, it seems clear that Clinton has a lot more to gain from ugly campaigning than Obama does. As the Economist notes:
A campaign that degenerates into name-calling and mud-slinging will hurt Mr Obama more than it does Mrs Clinton. He has campaigned on messages of “change” and “hope” so he faces an unenviable choice in the long run-up to Pennsylvania. If he lets the Clinton team fling the brickbats without retaliation she may set the tone of the campaign. But respond in kind and his message of a new politics is tarnished. Even though he is behind there in the polls, Pennsylvania cannot come soon enough for Mr Obama.
Time to settle in. I hope Obama weathers it without having to stoop too low.
Related Posts:
- The Lobbying vs. the Lobbyist (April, 2008)
- Obama: So Close, So Far (January, 2008)
- Dennis Kucinich (May, 2007)
- A “Losing Mistake” (February, 2006)
- Dad’s Letter to Barack (July, 2008)

Add New Comment
Viewing 2 Comments
Thanks. Your comment is awaiting approval by a moderator.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Add New Comment