<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: California Props</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mindtangle.net/2008/01/21/california-props/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mindtangle.net/2008/01/21/california-props/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:26:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ericnguyen</title>
		<link>http://mindtangle.net/2008/01/21/california-props/comment-page-1/#comment-14276</link>
		<dc:creator>ericnguyen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 12:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindtangle.net/2008/01/21/california-props/#comment-14276</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;danah blogged some more notes about the discussion, as well:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2008/01/31/my&lt;em&gt;february&lt;/em&gt;5_v.html&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>danah blogged some more notes about the discussion, as well:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2008/01/31/my" rel="nofollow">http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2008/01/31/my</a><em>february</em>5_v.html</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ericnguyen</title>
		<link>http://mindtangle.net/2008/01/21/california-props/comment-page-1/#comment-14249</link>
		<dc:creator>ericnguyen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 20:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindtangle.net/2008/01/21/california-props/#comment-14249</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, Gregory. This is just a personal blog, so your kind words overstate the case a bit, but I appreciate them. I help out with writing a more formal voter guide, most years. Those notes are better-researched than these, and you can find them here:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.false-profit.com/voterguide/&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There are lots of links to other voter guides there, too.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks again.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Gregory. This is just a personal blog, so your kind words overstate the case a bit, but I appreciate them. I help out with writing a more formal voter guide, most years. Those notes are better-researched than these, and you can find them here:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.false-profit.com/voterguide/" rel="nofollow">http://www.false-profit.com/voterguide/</a></p>

<p>There are lots of links to other voter guides there, too.</p>

<p>Thanks again.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory Miller</title>
		<link>http://mindtangle.net/2008/01/21/california-props/comment-page-1/#comment-14248</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 20:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindtangle.net/2008/01/21/california-props/#comment-14248</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I love this!  In a digital democracy one of the most important aspects is the ability to assemble and share information, ideas, and above all, content.  MindTangle represents an inspiring effort to do just that.  I&#039;d love to see this for the entire plate of issues before the voters.  Candidate Trusth Checking might be an interesting addition.  But the volume of content and each side&#039;s reality distortion field generally (IMHO) turns OFF the public, and there has to be resources like MindTangle to untangle the issues, positions, content, and potential outcomes of a yes or no vote.  I&#039;m an Oregonian and don&#039;t now if we have such an effort there, but really think this has tons of potential. Cheers
GAM&#124;out&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Check out www.osdv.org for something equally imperative.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this!  In a digital democracy one of the most important aspects is the ability to assemble and share information, ideas, and above all, content.  MindTangle represents an inspiring effort to do just that.  I&#8217;d love to see this for the entire plate of issues before the voters.  Candidate Trusth Checking might be an interesting addition.  But the volume of content and each side&#8217;s reality distortion field generally (IMHO) turns OFF the public, and there has to be resources like MindTangle to untangle the issues, positions, content, and potential outcomes of a yes or no vote.  I&#8217;m an Oregonian and don&#8217;t now if we have such an effort there, but really think this has tons of potential. Cheers
GAM|out</p>

<p>Check out <a href="http://www.osdv.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.osdv.org</a> for something equally imperative.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
