<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: California Props</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mindtangle.net/2008/01/21/california-props/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mindtangle.net/2008/01/21/california-props/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 01:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ericnguyen</title>
		<link>http://mindtangle.net/2008/01/21/california-props/#comment-14276</link>
		<dc:creator>ericnguyen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 12:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindtangle.net/2008/01/21/california-props/#comment-14276</guid>
		<description>danah blogged some more notes about the discussion, as well:

http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2008/01/31/my_february_5_v.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>danah blogged some more notes about the discussion, as well:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2008/01/31/my" rel="nofollow">http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2008/01/31/my</a><em>february</em>5_v.html</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ericnguyen</title>
		<link>http://mindtangle.net/2008/01/21/california-props/#comment-14249</link>
		<dc:creator>ericnguyen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 20:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindtangle.net/2008/01/21/california-props/#comment-14249</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Gregory. This is just a personal blog, so your kind words overstate the case a bit, but I appreciate them. I help out with writing a more formal voter guide, most years. Those notes are better-researched than these, and you can find them here:

   http://www.false-profit.com/voterguide/

There are lots of links to other voter guides there, too.

Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Gregory. This is just a personal blog, so your kind words overstate the case a bit, but I appreciate them. I help out with writing a more formal voter guide, most years. Those notes are better-researched than these, and you can find them here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.false-profit.com/voterguide/" rel="nofollow">http://www.false-profit.com/voterguide/</a></p>
<p>There are lots of links to other voter guides there, too.</p>
<p>Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory Miller</title>
		<link>http://mindtangle.net/2008/01/21/california-props/#comment-14248</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 20:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindtangle.net/2008/01/21/california-props/#comment-14248</guid>
		<description>I love this!  In a digital democracy one of the most important aspects is the ability to assemble and share information, ideas, and above all, content.  MindTangle represents an inspiring effort to do just that.  I'd love to see this for the entire plate of issues before the voters.  Candidate Trusth Checking might be an interesting addition.  But the volume of content and each side's reality distortion field generally (IMHO) turns OFF the public, and there has to be resources like MindTangle to untangle the issues, positions, content, and potential outcomes of a yes or no vote.  I'm an Oregonian and don't now if we have such an effort there, but really think this has tons of potential. Cheers
GAM&#124;out

Check out www.osdv.org for something equally imperative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this!  In a digital democracy one of the most important aspects is the ability to assemble and share information, ideas, and above all, content.  MindTangle represents an inspiring effort to do just that.  I&#8217;d love to see this for the entire plate of issues before the voters.  Candidate Trusth Checking might be an interesting addition.  But the volume of content and each side&#8217;s reality distortion field generally (IMHO) turns OFF the public, and there has to be resources like MindTangle to untangle the issues, positions, content, and potential outcomes of a yes or no vote.  I&#8217;m an Oregonian and don&#8217;t now if we have such an effort there, but really think this has tons of potential. Cheers<br />
GAM|out</p>
<p>Check out <a href="http://www.osdv.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.osdv.org</a> for something equally imperative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.760 seconds -->
